Tuesday, March 30, 2010

$100.000/Year is no longer the benchmark!


From the FINANCIAL Dynamic; 

One hundred thousand dollars. Since the 1980s, the magical "six-figure" salary has been a benchmark for financial success. Not too long ago, that income often meant two nice cars in the garage of a large house, fun family vacations and plenty of money left over to save for retirement and college tuition.


But times have changed. Not only has standard inflation steadily eroded the real value of a $100,000 income, the costs of housing, health insurance and college tuition have risen dramatically in recent years. Consider the rising costs of food, energy and the necessities of a middle-class life and that six-figure luxury quickly turns to six-figure mediocrity.
Less than 20 percent of American households even break the six figures, but many who earn incomes near the mark find that their prized incomes don't take them as far as the hype. Many say that while breaking the $100,000 annual income mark may still be an impressive milestone, it doesn't exactly roll out the red carpet.
Costs eat away at benchmark
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, only 5.63 percent of individual income earners and only 17.8 percent of households had incomes of $100,000 or more in 2006. In fact, the median annual household income for 2006 was $48,021, a little less than half of the six-figure benchmark. The overwhelming majority of Americans still look up to a $100,000 income, but the expectations of what comes with that income are rapidly slumping.
The Labor Department recently revealed that the inflation rate for 2007 was the worst in 17 years, with consumer prices rising 4.1 percent, compared to 2.5 percent in 2006. Much of this was fueled by energy costs (up 17.4 percent for the year) and food costs (up 4.9 percent for the year), both of which were the biggest increases since 1990. Just to keep up with standard inflation, a $100,000 salary in 1990 would have to be $162,760 today. Or reversing the view, a $100,000 salary in 2000, adjusted retroactively for inflation, would be worth only $82,609 today. (http://bit.ly/axBNwx)


To your wealth!
Leo Stroobants

Monday, March 29, 2010

Treasury Will Sell Citi Stake -- and Reap Billions in Profit

From the Financial Dynamic;


The Treasury Dept. will sell its stake in troubled banking giant Citigroup (C) over the course of the year, it announced today. This sets up the government to make a substantial profit at the bank's current share price.

Treasury says it will sell the 7.7 billion shares of Citigroup common stock it received in June, 2009, in connection to a $45 billion federal bailout. The government paid $25 billion for the stake, or $3.25 a share. At Citi's current share price of around $4.28, Treasury would book a profit of about $8 billion.
HealthierCapitalization

"Treasury intends to sell its Citi common shares into the market through various means in an orderly and measured fashion," the department
says in a press release. "Treasury intends to initiate its disposition of the common shares pursuant to a pre-arranged written trading plan."

Treasury, which owns about 27% of the
former financial supermarket, says the amount and timing of the sales are dependent upon a number of factors, a common arrangement to maximize profit from the transactions without disrupting the market for the company's stock.The department says it has engaged Morgan Stanley (MS) as its capital markets adviser on its Citigroup position.

Treasury adds that the sales don't affect its holdings of Citigroup trust preferred securities or warrants for its common stock.
At the end of 2009, Citi repaid $20 billion of the funds received under the federal government's Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).

Earlier this month, Citi CEO Vikram Pandit
told a congressional panel the companyis now among the best-capitalized banks in the world and deploys far less leverage. He said Citi has cut the size of its balance sheet by half a trillion dollars, or 21%, from peak levels in the third quarter of 2007 and substantially reduced its exposure to risky assets.


See full article from DailyFinance:
http://srph.it/djcn6U

To your financial well-being!
Leo Stroobants